Critique of mind over mass media

He proposes that electronic technology, such as PowerPoint, Google and Twitter enhances our mind. Pinker can not prove, that the quality of science is not decreasing.

Pinker observes, that the development of information technologies have always caused panic, but such scares usually are for no reasons. According to Pinker, new technologies have always scared people and this fear seems to be recurrent in the history.

The article points, that the knowledge of accomplished people is one-sided.

Mind Over Mass Media critique

Finally, when Pinker provides a credible source, the book of the psychologists Chabris and Simons, he reads it inconsistently. Researching and reasoning does not come naturally either. Internet is more powerful than the latters, Internet is creating a completely new dimension of relations between human and is impacting all the area of society in a way that has never be seen before.

Critics argue that our new technology is putting a strain on our brain.

On ‘Mind Over Mass Media’ by Pinker

Critics believe that the use of technology causes distractions, however self control is a key to using technology. For example being smart today might mean the effective usage of a search engine.

The article also blurs academic ways of knowledge creation with daily practices how masses get information. By using the internet, we do not attain the information in an instant just because we found a website and scanned through it. We will write a custom essay sample on Mind Over Mass Media critique or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not Waste HIRE WRITER According to him, new technologies change the way we think as every experience we encounter in our life and we should not be afraid of them because they are not changing our brain fundamentally.

This book shows how training in one field help to be better in it, but only in it. They must be taught and maintained by attending special institutions. One of those points demonstrates that people have been scared by technologies since for a long time only to after later use them daily and realize how useful they were.

Despite some ideas that Pinker puts well in perspective, hehis writing lacks of logic and supportive points to really prove that new technologies are not doing any harm to our societies.

If social media and networking caused a negative impact on our brain, all aspects of jobs and research would decline as well. Critics believe that these forms of technology lower our intelligence and shrink our attention spam.

As an example, the author connects decreasing crime rate with emerging new technologies. The article points that people need to use new technology with self-control.

Although Pinker provides interesting ideas and developments, he seems to only fly over the effects of new technologies in our societies and his paper is lacking credible studies and logical arguments.

By using more and more online services we learn their logic, we are more and more adapted to their usage. Retrieved on 23 June People should also learn how to prevent themselves from the addictive drift of social media. Sparrow demonstrates that Internet attenuates and weakens our memory capacities.

Pinker is demonstrating insightfully that despite those fears, people did not stop thinking. More decisive arguments could have helped his ideas. On the other hand, Pinker is biased to social media and especially social networking sites.

In the same way, Pinker cites examples of comic books and video games fears, new media that are today completely and normally integrated in our way of life.

Online services make information searchable and shareable so the structure of the information needs to be logical.

Pinker assumes that it will be the same for technologies. In the competitive market the services also needs to attract the users. These service needs to be easily usable for non-experts. However, some points of this paper seem to be based only on opinions and lack of credible source or even logic.

Yet, new technologies and particularly Internet are not another medium, or science.Pinker, S. (). “Mind Over Mass Media.” The New Your Times Online.

Retrieved on 23 June In his understanding “[i]f electronic media were hazardous to intelligence, the quality of science would be plummeting” by scientist are using information technologies. By accepting, that “experience can change the brain” he argues. Jul 06,  · Steven Pinker’s “Mind Over Mass Media” illustrates the impact of the new media on our lives.

Critics argue that our new technology is putting a strain on our brain. Critics believe that these forms of technology lower.

Katherine Liu Critique of “Mind Over Mass Media” by Steven Pinker In the article “Mind Over Mass Media,” written by cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker on June 10, for The New York Times newspaper, Pinker argues that the new media and technologies have positive affects on people’s mental development.

Your Brain on Media: Steven Pinker's "Mind Over Mass Media" How the mind works was a New York Times bestseller in and was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, as was his book, Blank slate: The modern denial of human nature.

Jul 05,  · Mind Over Mass Media by Professor Steven Pinker Posted on July 5, by silviac7 In this essay professor Steven Pinker Shows his point of view about a really debated argument made by media critics. Mass Media In the article, “Mind Over Mass Media”, published in in The New York Times, Steven Pinker, a Psychology professor at Harvard, discusses how new technologies can impact our brain.

He also replies to the common critics about them.

Critique of mind over mass media
Rated 4/5 based on 8 review